Comment I recently posted on Counter-Currents under the essay titled, The Eternal City, the Ruined City, & the Battle of Cannæ:
What has been the biggest enemy of White ethnicities?
The answer: ‘Western Civilization‘.
The White man needs to ask himself whether this civilization helped him answer the following questions:
– What is Man?
– What is Being?
Now when the White race arrives at, perhaps, the most critical moment in its collective history, it is about time that it dispassionately reassessed the road it took thousands of years ago.
The subtext is not that there is already a civilization or culture out there that correctly understood the aforementioned queries; and that Whites are therefore advised to follow it.
The point is that these queries are too profound to be unlocked by philosophical treatises or doctrines. They are beyond human cognitive capacity.
When we try to define ourselves, we transcend ourselves. And once we are in a transcendental mode, we require a transcendental point of reference.
It has to be necessarily above us.
This point of reference is called Waḥy, which is translated in English as ‘revelation’.
A human race should not exist because other human races also exist.
It should not exist because there is ‘scientific evidence of its existence’.
It should not exist because it achieved this or that technical landmark or erected this or that literary edifice, and, consequently, it has earned the right to survive.
It should exist because it is also one of the manifestations of the Divine order.
O Mankind, We have created you from a male and a female and made you into races and tribes, so that you may identify one another. Surely, the noblest of you, in Allah’s sight, is the one who is most pious of you. Surely Allah is All-Knowing, All-Aware. [Qur’an: 49:13]
I commented the following on an article [If You’re So Trad, Why Don’t You Move to Afghanistan] on Counter-Currents where I share my views under the name ‘Muhammad Aryan’.
The text in bold is parts that I quote from the article.
To which Mr. Vehmgericht replied,
I reply as follows:
So what if it is Arabic??
Linguistic expression rests in the metaphysical domain.
It is one aspect that distinguishes us human beings from other living creatures. It is something above the biological existence.
On the biological grade, we are all divided into different races and tribes.
However, on the metaphysical level, we are all the same.
For instance, how does a Dravidian who speaks Tamil or Malayalam or Kannada, etc., masters the languages of the Indo-European or Afro-Asiatic families?
How does a Korean or Indonesian learn English or French or German and vice versa?
So on and so forth.
A child does not born with a language already saved in his memory. He familiarizes himself with the sounds he hears around him and then tries to express them with his tongue.
What if a child born to German parents grows up in a Spanish household where he never listens to a word of German? Will he speak German? That is why to preserve a culture, it is necessary that children of a given ethnolinguistic community be taught about their ancestral heritage. Otherwise, that heritage will be lost.
There are many non-Whites who speak and write English better than most Englishmen, however, that does NOT mean that English heritage will be preserved even if there are no Whites Anglo-Saxons around.
Immigrants who migrate to Western lands like the UK, USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the Netherlands, Belgium, etc., from South/West Asia faced this disconnect. Many a time, their children cannot speak the language of their ancestors or those who do speak, speak it in alien accents. Indeed, this is a strange breed of men which does not belong anywhere. It hangs in the air. It has no grounding.
Anyhow, coming back to the argument.
Men can learn any language. As we can see, it is quite evident.
There are Muslims of Han, Senegalese, Berber, Kurdish, Indonesian, Caucasian, Tamil, Bengali, Assamese, Turkic etc., stock who when recite the Arabic verses do not give a hint that they belong to an entirely different linguistic family.
Qur’an was revealed in Arabic because learning and mastering a language is embedded in our constitution. It is a universal aspect of human nature.
Hence, if Providence chose Arabic for the transmission of the Final Revelation to mankind, it was perfectly in line with our disposition.
My take on the article [No Civil War, No Secession link: https://bannedhipster.home.blog/2021/09/13/no-civil-war-no-secession/ ]:
What if the dissident sphere begins to embrace Islam in droves? How will the anti-White ruling gang which panders to immigrants and racial minorities then respond?
How will these Whites be categorized? White supremacist Muslims??
Imagine a large group of White men and women marches towards Capitol Hill. Once reached there, it organizes a congregational prayer. Afterward, the leader, a blue-eyed man with a lush golden beard steps forward and lays out the demands which include segregated homelands for White American Muslims. Whether the demand is met or not, White Muslims will continue to have a disciplined social life (according to Islam) outside the nasty reach of political bureaucracy, which has more or less completely obliterated organic life or the community life (as far as the Occident is concerned).
Hizbollah, Sepah e Pasdaran, Basij, Taliban, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., these are all first and foremost metapolitical mobilizations without which organic life will get pulverized under bureaucratic encorachment.
It is a struggle against satanism, pure and simple. Let there be no two ways about that.
Whites will need a spiritual system to repulse the devilry. And with all due respect, I do not think Norse sagas or Crusader larping will be lethal enough against the devil.
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
It’s a fantasy for right-wing white males. It’s a specifically male thing, because males like violence, and violence seems simple. The more undisciplined version is Fedposting, the more sophisticated version discusses the logistics in a coy fashion.
I love these guys, because they are typically pretty smart, and also completely delusional. They are what Steve Sailer would call “content generators” for anti-reactionaries like me.
Discussion of the vulnerability of the electrical grid and…
View original post 1,360 more words
Two men were wandering when they came across a strange signboard which said, ‘We Teach the Learned How to Learn’.
The men were puzzled. Anyhow, they followed the directions and reached the spot where they saw an old man surrounded by his young students. The men calculated that that old man must be the one they were concerned with. They uttered the greetings and shared their amazement and curiosity. In order to quench their thirst, the old man decided to conduct a little demonstration. He inquired one of them if he could identify the thing standing just across from where they were all sitting. The man replied emphatically that that was a tree.
The old man said, “Did it itself give you this introduction of itself?”
Perplexed, the man said, “How can it be possible? It is a description I bestowed on it.”
The old man said, “When each and every element of its account emanates from the name you confer on it then how can you say that whatever you know is what the object truly is? It means that you had a certain conception of this thing and upon encountering it you enshrouded it with that conception. How can you claim to know it?
Remember, our being also gets mingled with our sense data and abstractions which cripple our claims of knowledge. Our being blocks our perception. And, therefore, we need illumination to overcome this darkness.
So, what is knowledge?
Knowledge is the cognizance we attain when we discern things under the divine light of the All-Knowing (Al-Alim, one of the attributes of Allah Almighty).
A misalignment between ontology and epistemology will not generate awareness but vacuous conceptual impositions on things.
Note: This is NOT a literal translation. The original expressions may lose their core if they are subjected to word to word translation.
The United Kingdom carelessly refused any serious understanding with Wilhelmine Germany. The Teutophobia of the political class was deplorable. It had been building up since the German unification. The Monarchy should have intervened and restrained the out of control anti-German clique.
Europe was humiliated at Versailles by Europeans, and a generation later it was all over.
Germany did surrender but it took with it the British and French empires.
This an expansion of a comment I posted on Z blog.
I think the last greatest metapolitical shift in the history of Western Europe was the execution (1649) of Charles I at the hands of the Cromwellian parliamentary gang.
Here is how the late British philosopher Anthony Ludovici describes the struggle in his A Defence of Aristocracy:
“The triumph of Parliament did not mean the triumph of the liberties of the people. It meant the triumph of a new morality, a new outlook on life, and a new understanding of what life was worth. It meant the triumph of the morality of unrestricted competition, of uncontrolled and unguided trade, and of a policy of neglect in regard to all things that really mattered.” [pgs. 161-162]
The forces that are beyond political bureaucratization like religion, family, and ethnocultural ties/blood ties determine metapolitics. This particular triad prevents political accretion turning into a malignancy.
After 1649, the malignant forces were in the ascendance. They were to systematically destroy this defensive triad so as to clear the way for the ‘new morality’, which meant social organic body would serve the commercial/monetary interests and not vice versa.
The following are the weapons deployed to sabotage the three metapolitical pillars:
- Freedom of Expression/Speech: against Religion and that which was held as sacred; the bifurcation of freedom and responsibility; in other words, a ‘freedom’ bereft of self-restraint.
- Sexual Liberation/Deviancy/Libertinism: against the Family; the target was to undermine responsible motherhood without which there is no guarantee that a people would survive as a distinct race/ethnicity.
- Commercial competition: against the organic camaraderie of a society; pit one against the other in the name of ‘individual enterprise’; reduce men into consumers with unquenchable material thirsts.
Now, if you try to read the last 500 years of Occidental history against the aforementioned background, you will understand how a full-fledged ‘liberal democracy’ is a stage of total, vicious, and wicked political bureaucratization of every aspect of life.
The Japanese appear to be on the road to extinction. The demographics augur a depressing scenario.
A hundred years ago this race of men was radiating with energy and vitality. The swiftness with which it adopted industrialization was just frightening.
The Japanese displayed exemplary intra-racial discipline. They took on the Occident when the latter’s physical dominance of the globe was at its zenith. The wounds they inflicted on the British imperial prestige in the Far East during the Second World War proved terminal for British naval supremacy.
Then, they fought a costly war with their Pacific neighbors i.e the USA. It ended in humiliation. Japan was occupied by the victorious US forces. It was the first and only time in their thousands of years of history that the Japanese were occupied by a foreign power.
They signed a constitutional framework at gunpoint. From then on, they were to focus their racial and cultural energies on commerce and mass industrial output.
And, indeed, what a transformation it was !!
Sony, Toshiba, Yamaha, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, Toyota, Honda, Suzuki, Nissan, Panasonic, Fujitsu, Canon, etc. planted the Japanese commercial flag all over the world.
But then something happened. Consumerist decadence began to set in.
Commercial health became paramount. Economics enveloped the whole social existence.
Material prosperity scarred the Japanese spirit.
Why did the Japanese culture, traditions, wisdom etc. fail to shield the Japanese spirit from the gangrene of modernity?
Your technological achievements give an impression that you are a highly intelligent and smart group of people. But, at the same time, you seem to be disappearing as a racial group.
What kind of ‘superior intelligence’ is this that ultimately pushes you over the precipice?
A people so committed to their own ethno-cultural destruction can be anything but intelligent and wise.
Some standard definitions of ‘dreaming’ are as follows:
“something which one seems to see or experience during asleep”
“a dream is an imaginary series of events that you experience in your mind while your are asleep.”
Likewise, some standard definitions of ‘sleep’ are as follows:
“rest in a state of natural unconsciousness.”
“sleep is the natural state of rest in which your mind and body are inactive and unconscious.”
Now, compare the two set of definitions.
If the mind [which is consciousness] is ‘inactive’ and ‘unconscious’ when I am asleep, how does ‘experience’ take place in an entity which is by definition is in a state of unconsciousness?
Since experience and seeing imply consciousness, what is this unconscious seeing that occurs in dreaming?
Who dreams when I am asleep?
What is this realm?
What is this ‘I’?
How many I’s are there?
The meltdown will continue…unless there is a recognition that it was a mistake to apply the vocabulary of physics to matters that are and will remain metaphysical.
Has the globalization of the English language been intellectually beneficial for the native White English speakers [Britishers, Americans, Canadians, Australians, and New Zealanders] and other non-English speaking Occidentals?
Has it rendered them susceptible to greater political manipulation?
They understand the world in the English language.
Is this understanding superfluous or deep?
Is it primary or secondary?
Look at it this way.
Many of us do not need a translator or a Routledge/Oxford/Cambridge/Penguin/Palgrave Macmillan handbook to know what is taking place in the Occident.
Familiarity with English [as far as West Asia and South Asia are concerned] and in other cases French and German outside academia is quite common.
Unlike in the West where the academia acts as a kind of suspicious intermediary, we know politics in the West like the back of our hands.
Therefore, here, political elites find it tremendously difficult to sell ‘meaningful engagement with the West’ and other related nonsense.
People are generally aware (((who))) holds the bridle of the West and who, eventually, would gain from this ‘engagement’.
Now, put the Occident in the aforementioned context.
How many in the Occident know Arabic, Persian, Urdu, Turkish etc. outside the academia?
When they read the news, how do they know that a certain anti-western leader’s words have been translated correctly? Or that a certain country’s internal political dynamics, history, society etc. are being portrayed accurately?
The correct answers to these inquiries will reveal why it has been so easy for Western political elites to gain enthusiasts and addicts for their ‘Judeo-Christian/Rome Jerusalem/Western Civilization is superior’ fantasies.