No Civil War, No Secession

My take on the article [No Civil War, No Secession link: https://bannedhipster.home.blog/2021/09/13/no-civil-war-no-secession/ ]:

What if the dissident sphere begins to embrace Islam in droves? How will the anti-White ruling gang which panders to immigrants and racial minorities then respond?

How will these Whites be categorized? White supremacist Muslims??

Imagine a large group of White men and women marches towards Capitol Hill. Once reached there, it organizes a congregational prayer. Afterward, the leader, a blue-eyed man with a lush golden beard steps forward and lays out the demands which include segregated homelands for White American Muslims. Whether the demand is met or not, White Muslims will continue to have a disciplined social life (according to Islam) outside the nasty reach of political bureaucracy, which has more or less completely obliterated organic life or the community life (as far as the Occident is concerned).

Hizbollah, Sepah e Pasdaran, Basij, Taliban, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., these are all first and foremost metapolitical mobilizations without which organic life will get pulverized under bureaucratic encorachment.

It is a struggle against satanism, pure and simple. Let there be no two ways about that.

Whites will need a spiritual system to repulse the devilry. And with all due respect, I do not think Norse sagas or Crusader larping will be lethal enough against the devil.

https://youtu.be/bSR_G-Ic_Jk

Banned Hipster

Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.

H. L. Mencken

It’s a fantasy for right-wing white males. It’s a specifically male thing, because males like violence, and violence seems simple. The more undisciplined version is Fedposting, the more sophisticated version discusses the logistics in a coy fashion.

I love these guys, because they are typically pretty smart, and also completely delusional. They are what Steve Sailer would call “content generators” for anti-reactionaries like me.

Discussion of the vulnerability of the electrical grid and…

View original post 1,360 more words

Afghanistan As China’s Vietnam

“Under Reagan, the Taliban, then called Mujahideen, were invited to the White House for photo-ops and declared the Afghani equivalent of our Founding Fathers.”

Taliban emerged later in the mid-90’s as a force that sought to crush the CIA warlords whose Bacha Bazi and other devilish deeds were making life more hellish for the ordinary Afghans.

Banned Hipster

Michael Scheuer has some very sharp words about Afghanistan as he always has. He points out the British called certain military actions “punitive campaigns.” You go into a country, kill a bunch of men, women, and children, bomb a bunch of buildings, blow up some bridges and dams … then you leave. You know they will leave you alone for a couple of years as they rebuild.

On the surface at least this is what Scheuer wanted for Afghanistan. Go in, kill Osama Bin Laden, kill the Taliban leadership, bomb weddings to demoralize the population, then get the hell out, by 2004 at the latest.

But the US stayed for 20 years. Why? Scheuer makes a chilling revelation. He claims during the initial planning for the war, the Pentagon completely ignored the people who were Afghanistan specialists. He mentions a specific paper done that laid out the basic knowledge and…

View original post 1,295 more words

‘You DO NOT Have a Right To An Opinion On A Topic About Which You Know Little or Nothing’

I have tremendous regard for Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson who presents a weekly podcast at Radio Albion.

Being a scholar of Russian Orthodox Church and philosophy and belonging to the Orthodox tradition himself, he brings a fresh perspective on things which one rarely comes across in the Anglophone world.

At the start of a podcast, which was broadcasted almost a decade ago, he said:

“Today is October 18th 2011. It is my 40th birthday today…As I get older there are a few things that are happening; I am losing patience with the pedestrian mentality in politics and history. This is a big problem largely because it’s not harmless. This sort of thing is not a hobby. This kind of thing is not something you should be doing because you need to prove to the world that you are smart. You could do a lot of damage. And if you go through the blogs and you see people some of whom have good intentions some of whom have very bad intentions spreading a lot of rumors and half-truths, not necessarily because they are deliberately manipulating people but they simply don’t know any better. And I tell you something. These forty years, forty years today and there is one thing about our social life that I have learnt and that really going to be on my tombstone one day. An epitaph. And that’s this simple phrase, and I want you to think about it in great detail and depth: ‘You DO NOT have a right to an opinion on a topic about which you know little or nothing.’ That statement in a lot very important ways summarizes the epistemology of Plato. It summarizes a lot of the semi-aristocratic approach to these disciplines. You know when I first got into this field 21 years ago, I haven’t taken a vacation; even when I do go away or do something that supposed to be fun, I bring all my books with me. I never stop thinking about these things which is a good thing and a terrible thing in many ways…In coming with even a tentative opinion on let’s say the political thought of James Madison, Napoleon, the French Revolution, you are talking about 10 solid full time years minimum in my opinion of going over the massive almost ridiculously massive amount of material out there. And then may be you can a very tentative opinion that you put forth with great trepidation. When somebody is talking about a topic, a very important topic, a very complicated topic, they think they know a few things; they have read a couple of books about it and they think they something. They have NO IDEA what they are missing. They have no idea the amount of material that you need to go through even for a tentative opinion. I am saying 10 years minimum and that’s as a full-time occupation. When I was in grad school and then afterwards at the Barnes Review and places like this, I lost a lot of sleep because I needed to solve certain problems. Who was right in the 19th century say the Russian Empire or Ukraine? What makes more sense form our point of view? An empire or a strong nation-state? These kind of questions. I lost sleep. And let me tell you I have lost friends and even family members over these issues. And the amount of material, the tens of thousands of pages whether it be in English or Russian or Ukrainian or Serbian that I poured through. And the amount of time I lost, the occupations I couldn’t do, the attacks that I have come under by the professional academics for even bringing up some of these topics in the way that we do and going through this ridiculously massive amount of material that the amateurs out there don’t even know exists, never mind, has ever been through. And 20 years of this non-stop, pretty much 365 days a year and that level of intensity; constant reading and constant writing and constant talking with professors and other experts and trying to ask the right questions and getting everything together and really developing almost an obsession, almost a pathological condition; going over this stuff for this many years in a relatively specialized field, YOU WILL PARDON ME IF I GET A LITTLE SNIPPY WHEN SOME PUNK WRITES ME WHO HAS READ A COUPLE OF BOOKS ON THIS…AND HE IS GONNA START LECTURING ME ON IT; SO ONE OF THE FEW TIMES YOU KNOW I AM GONNA CLOCK SOMEBODY IF THEY ARE IN FRONT OF ME. If you are not a bona fide expert on a topic; either you have the education; you have the publications; you have all the years you got to put in to even come up with a tentative opinion on these topics; especially topics like the British Empire, French Revolution, or Unification of Germany; the amount of material you couldn’t shoot through; you could build a house with just the English language material on this topic; PLEASE SHUT UP IF YOU HAVEN’T GONE THROUGH ALL OF IT OR MOST OF IT. YOU DON’T KNOW. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU MIGHT BE MISSING; WHAT YOU HAVEN’T COME ACROSS. One if the things that I have learned in these…now 20 full time years. I have never had a normal job. This is what I have done FULL-TIME since I was 18. When you simply don’t know and you go out and you are on these stupid blogs and you are trying to say something and if you make an error; we all make silly errors, but I am talking about serious stuff where you are coming up with theories that are contradicted by facts you don’t know exists because you haven’t been through the material and the years it takes to get through it all and the SUFFERING that it takes; this is not something you used to read after dinner because it’s relaxing; this is something that you do and it’s painful sometimes. You are constantly suffering through these problems. I used to wake up at 2 in the morning; run to my desk and go through…because I have some inspiration on a particular topic. I mean this is how you live. This is a life style that you choose. It’s not a hobby. It’s not something you people decide to do because it makes you seem smart or because you think it is going to impress someone or you are going to change the world or you are gonna be a leader or you wanna make a couple of bucks. When you get on these blogs you see this crap; just pure factual absurdity…think of a young student going through this and they start believing some of this stuff is true; you are poisoning the atmosphere; you are poisoning the debate when you inject this kind of ignorance and extreme amateurism into these things. You could do a lot of damage and you could hurt a lot of people because if they believe some of this is true and they go spouting it, they are gonna sound like morons.”

Michael Scheuer’s CIA Disinformation

‘Islamist terrorism aka War on Terrorism’ was a superhit TV series that ran for almost 25 years. Then, it was succeeded by ‘War against White Supremacist Terror’.

Where there were once ‘Middle East Experts’ and various ‘academic authorities on Islam’ populating the (((mass communications))) to rationalize the White man’s heroic struggle against rogue CIA officials like Bin Laden, Zawahiri, Zarqawi etc., there are now ‘gender experts’, ‘race relations offices’ etc., directing the ‘narrative’.

Banned Hipster

Michael Scheuer is an interesting guy. The head of CIA’s “Bin Laden unit” before and after 9/11, he became infamous writing a book, Imperial Hubris, critiquing the “War On Terror.” He maintained a public posture of strict non-interventionism and made sharp critiques of the Israel lobby and the Zionist entity itself.

But as with all CIA people, he’s a liar and a propagandist, as that is his job after all. As a young man reeling from 9/11, I bought his gimmick hook, line and sinker, but as I gained some wisdom I realized how all of his output was more or less just attempts to maintain the 9/11 official story.

He used a very effective type of lying; simply lying less than everyone else. At the time, the moronic conservatives were telling people that “radical Muslims” hated America “for our freedoms” and because women wore swimsuits at the beach. Scheuer…

View original post 918 more words

ای غنچه خوابیده چو نرگس نگران خیز

ای غنچه خوابیده چو نرگس نگران خیز

کاشانهٔ ما رفت بتاراج غمان خیز

از ناله مرغ چمن از بانگ اذان خیز

از گرمی هنگامه آتش نفسان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

خورشید که پیرایه بسیمای سحر بست

آویزه بگوش سحر از خون جگر بست

از دشت و جبل قافله ها رخت سفر بست

ای چشم جهان بین بتماشای جهان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

خاور همه مانند غبار سر راهی است

یک ناله خاموش و اثر باخته آهی است

هر ذره این خاک گره خورده نگاهی است

از هند و سمرقند و عراق و همدان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

دریای تو دریاست که آسوده چو صحراست

دریای تو دریاست که افزون نشد و کاست

بیگانهٔ آشوب و نهنگ است چه دریاست

از سینه چاکش صفت موج روان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

این نکته گشاینده اسرار نهان است

ملک است تن خاکی و دین روح روان است

تن زنده و جان زنده ز ربط تن و جان است

با خرقه و سجاده و شمشیر و سنان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

ناموس ازل را تو امینی تو امینی

دارای جهان را تو یساری تو یمینی

ای بندهٔ خاکی تو زمانی تو زمینی

صهبای یقین در کش و از دیر گمان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

فریاد از افرنگ و دلآویزی افرنگ

فریاد ز شیرینی و پرویزی افرنگ

عالم همه ویرانه ز چنگیزی افرنگ

معمار حرم باز به تعمیر جهان خیز

از خواب گران خواب گران خواب گران خیز

از خواب گران خیز

اقبال لاهوری